124
edits
TJ-II:Impurity density and potential asymmetries: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TJ-II:Impurity density and potential asymmetries (view source)
Revision as of 09:28, 20 July 2018
, 20 July 2018no edit summary
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
== Results == | == Results == | ||
[[File: | [[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-33-36.jpg |thumb|right|300px| Figure 1. | ||
Numerical vs Experiment electron-root #45477 discharge: | |||
(a,b) Numerical impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the | |||
experimental radiation asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{rad}</math> respectively at the toroidal plane | |||
<math>\phi=14.5^{\circ}</math> that corresponds the SXR toroidal measurement plane. (c,d) Numerical | |||
impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the experimental radiation asymmetry | |||
parameter <math>\alpha_{rad}</math> respectively at the toroidal plane <math>\phi=75.5^{\circ}</math> that corresponds | |||
the Bolometery toroidal position. Note the numerical and experimental scale sare | |||
the same <math>[-0.38, 0.38]</math>. Since neon impurities were puffed at trave levels during the discharges, the numerical | |||
results in (a,c) have considered <math>Z_{I}=10</math>, i.e. they have assumed fully ionization of Ne on the whole | |||
effective radius <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport | |||
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | ||
[[File: | [[File:photo_2018-07-20_09-32-57 |thumb|right|300px| Figure 1. SXR radiation for the ion-root discharge 45469 <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport | ||
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | ||