124
edits
TJ-II:Validation of ECCD predictions in TJ-II ECRH plasmas: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TJ-II:Validation of ECCD predictions in TJ-II ECRH plasmas (view source)
Revision as of 11:41, 7 March 2018
, 7 March 2018→Description of required resources
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) |
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
# Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL1, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | # Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL1, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | ||
# Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL2, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | # Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL2, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | ||
# Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL1, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>, simultaneously to the employment of QTL2 with <math>N_{\|}=0.0</math> on-axis for auxiliary heating the background plasma. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | # Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL1, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>, simultaneously to the employment of QTL2 with <math>N_{\|}=0.0</math> on-axis for auxiliary heating the background plasma. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | ||
# Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL2, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>, simultaneously to the employment of QTL1 with <math>N_{\|}=0.0</math> on-axis for auxiliary heating the background plasma. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | # Characterization of the current driven using only the transmission line QTL2, injecting on-axis and with <math>N_{\|}=\left\{-0.3, -0.15, 0.0, 0.15, 0.3\right\}</math>, simultaneously to the employment of QTL1 with <math>N_{\|}=0.0</math> on-axis for auxiliary heating the background plasma. Considering 2 discharges per value of <math>N_{\|}\ \Rightarrow</math> 10 discharges. | ||
# Finally, for a high <math>N_{\|}</math> the loss of X-mode polarization and the presence of spurious O-mode is expected at the resonance layer. Then, the current induction and power absorption may be sub-obtimal, and a scan on the ellipticity of the beam polarization at its launching position is foreseen in order to correct this effect. 10 discharges needed. | # Finally, for a high <math>N_{\|}</math> the loss of X-mode polarization and the presence of spurious O-mode is expected at the resonance layer. Then, the current induction and power absorption may be sub-obtimal, and a scan on the ellipticity of the beam polarization at its launching position is foreseen in order to correct this effect. 10 discharges needed. | ||