76
edits
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement (view source)
Revision as of 12:19, 1 June 2020
, 1 June 2020no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There seems to be some similarity between this concept and the Yin-Yang coils of the MFTF-B mirror machine. See | There seems to be some similarity between this concept and the Yin-Yang coils of the MFTF-B mirror machine. See | ||
* R.W. Moir and R.F. Post [[doi:10.1088/0029-5515/9/3/009|Nucl. Fusion 9 (1969) 243]] | |||
* [[:Wikipedia:Tandem_Mirror_Experiment|Tandem_Mirror_Experiment]] | * [[:Wikipedia:Tandem_Mirror_Experiment|Tandem_Mirror_Experiment]] | ||
* [https://lasttechage.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/the-mftfb-story-fusion-or-confusion/ The MFTF-B story – Fusion or conFusion?] | * [https://lasttechage.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/the-mftfb-story-fusion-or-confusion/ The MFTF-B story – Fusion or conFusion?] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
but I lack the technical means and knowledges to find out which could be better, if any. | but I lack the technical means and knowledges to find out which could be better, if any. | ||
[[User:Solo55| | [[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]])13:52, 29 February 2016 (CET) | ||
Sorry. where I said in last post "or a multi-phase pulsating direct current" I mean "or a multi-phase full-wave rectified alternating current". | Sorry. where I said in last post "or a multi-phase pulsating direct current" I mean "or a multi-phase full-wave rectified alternating current". | ||
[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:07, 4 March 2016 (CET) | [[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:07, 4 March 2016 (CET) | ||
now I think it's probably clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only, since a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement. | |||
then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in finding the proper balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimum of useful frequency to confine relatively the D-T mixture at the central area of the devices and to induce it a certain '''spin'''. | |||
in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting many linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed. | |||
[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 21:18, 25 September 2016 (CEST) | |||
All previous hypotheses are wrong. | |||
They are no more than speculations with no technical basis. | |||
It seems that the proposed configurations require a very different approach. | |||
Though these magnets seem to generate a null field at the central area, | |||
direct current would produce confinement losses when applied to them | |||
or, at their best, particles recirculation with a same loss as a result. | |||
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 13:18, 1 June 2020 (CEST) | |||