Plasma simulation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Codes
(→Codes) |
(→Codes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Codes can either be interpretative (taking some input from experiment) or predictive. | Codes can either be interpretative (taking some input from experiment) or predictive. | ||
Recent years have seen an increased effort in the field of code benchmarking. | They can be full-tokamak (or full-stellarator), or simulate only a small portion of plasma (a flux tube, the edge, or the Scrape-Off Layer). | ||
Recent years have seen an increased effort in the field of cross code benchmarking. | |||
<ref>Nevins W.M. et al, Phys. Plasmas '''13''' (2006) 122306</ref> | <ref>Nevins W.M. et al, Phys. Plasmas '''13''' (2006) 122306</ref> | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/8/012 A.M. Dimits et al, Nucl. Fusion '''47''' (2007) 817-824]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/8/012 A.M. Dimits et al, Nucl. Fusion '''47''' (2007) 817-824]</ref> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
=== Fluid codes === | === Fluid codes === | ||
* [[CUTIE]] | * [[CUTIE]] (predictive, full-tokamak) | ||
* [[EDGE2D-NIMBUS]] (edge) | |||
* [[UEDGE]] | |||
* [[SOLPS]] | |||
=== Monte Carlo === | |||
* [[MOCA]] | |||
* [[EIRENE]] (edge) | |||
=== Gyrokinetic codes === | === Gyrokinetic codes === | ||