15
edits
Unipolar arcing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Model of Arcing== | ==Model of Arcing== | ||
The electron emission at the cathode spot occurs in the form of discrete explosive electron emission splashes, so-called 'ectons'. These quanta of the explosive process represent the minimum actions required for the explosive events. The duration of one ecton is about <math>\sim</math>10 ns, the current <math>\sim</math>1 A, and the size of the emission centers is about <math>\sim1</math> <math>\ | The electron emission at the cathode spot occurs in the form of discrete explosive electron emission splashes, so-called 'ectons'. These quanta of the explosive process represent the minimum actions required for the explosive events. The duration of one ecton is about <math>\sim</math>10 ns, the current <math>\sim</math>1 A, and the size of the emission centers is about <math>\sim1</math> <math>\mu</math>m. The explosion leaves a micro crater with a diameter of about <math>\sim1</math> <math>\mu</math>m. | ||
According to the ecton model, arc operation is self-sustained, and occurs in stages \cite{Bar2011} (Figure \ref{fig:arc_mech}). The first stage is the appearance of dense primary erosion plasma due to the external action, e.g. a laser pulse or ELM-plasma, onto the target. This dense plasma action results in a strong emission pulse (<math>10^8</math> A/cm<math>^2</math>) that leads to a thermal explosion of the emitting local area, the start of stage two. The created dense plasma produces two important effects: 1) the sheath thickness reduces, leading to an increase in the electric field at the surface, and 2) (due to the electric field) the ion bombardment heating increases. Now, if the local electric field is additionally enhanced by the fine structure of the surface, e.g. tungsten fuzz, this can all together intensify the local energy input, leading to a thermal run-away process. If the energy input rate exceeds the energy removing rate, this can lead to a micro-explosion. The micro-explosion creates another dense erosion plasma, and hence creates another emission site, so this causes repeating ignition of micro-explosions. The dense plasma provides the conditions for the ignition while 'choking' the already operating emission center by its limited conductivity \footnote{During the explosive gas phase, material is evaporated which increases the gas density in front of the emission site. Since gas is a bad conductor, the current transfer capability suffers.}. Ignition in this sense is not just the triggering of the arc discharge but the arc's perpetual mechanism to 'stay alive.' The probabilistic distribution of ignition of emission centers can be associated with a fractal spot model\footnote{Fractals are mathematical or physical objects invariant to scaling, so called 'self-similar'. They occur in phenomena which are nonlinear, aperiodic, and chaotic, such as arcing \cite{And2008}.} | According to the ecton model, arc operation is self-sustained, and occurs in stages \cite{Bar2011} (Figure \ref{fig:arc_mech}). The first stage is the appearance of dense primary erosion plasma due to the external action, e.g. a laser pulse or ELM-plasma, onto the target. This dense plasma action results in a strong emission pulse (<math>10^8</math> A/cm<math>^2</math>) that leads to a thermal explosion of the emitting local area, the start of stage two. The created dense plasma produces two important effects: 1) the sheath thickness reduces, leading to an increase in the electric field at the surface, and 2) (due to the electric field) the ion bombardment heating increases. Now, if the local electric field is additionally enhanced by the fine structure of the surface, e.g. tungsten fuzz, this can all together intensify the local energy input, leading to a thermal run-away process. If the energy input rate exceeds the energy removing rate, this can lead to a micro-explosion. The micro-explosion creates another dense erosion plasma, and hence creates another emission site, so this causes repeating ignition of micro-explosions. The dense plasma provides the conditions for the ignition while 'choking' the already operating emission center by its limited conductivity \footnote{During the explosive gas phase, material is evaporated which increases the gas density in front of the emission site. Since gas is a bad conductor, the current transfer capability suffers.}. Ignition in this sense is not just the triggering of the arc discharge but the arc's perpetual mechanism to 'stay alive.' The probabilistic distribution of ignition of emission centers can be associated with a fractal spot model\footnote{Fractals are mathematical or physical objects invariant to scaling, so called 'self-similar'. They occur in phenomena which are nonlinear, aperiodic, and chaotic, such as arcing \cite{And2008}.} | ||