4,427
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/8/4096/1 F. Jenko et al, ''Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes'', Phys. Plasmas '''8''' (2001) 4096]</ref> | <ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/8/4096/1 F. Jenko et al, ''Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes'', Phys. Plasmas '''8''' (2001) 4096]</ref> | ||
== Observations | == Observations == | ||
=== [[Tokamak]]s === | |||
* TFTR <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/26/7/002 E.D. Fredrickson, J.D. Callen, et al., ''Heat pulse propagation studies in TFTR'', Nucl. Fusion '''26''' (1986) 849]</ref> | * TFTR <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/26/7/002 E.D. Fredrickson, J.D. Callen, et al., ''Heat pulse propagation studies in TFTR'', Nucl. Fusion '''26''' (1986) 849]</ref> | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
* Various devices <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/35/10/002 F. Wagner and U. Stroth, ''Transport in toroidal devices-the experimentalist's view'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''35''' (1993) 1321]</ref><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/43/12A/325 F. Ryter, C. Angioni, et al., ''Experimental studies of electron transport'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''43''' (2001) A323]</ref> | * Various devices <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/35/10/002 F. Wagner and U. Stroth, ''Transport in toroidal devices-the experimentalist's view'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''35''' (1993) 1321]</ref><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/43/12A/325 F. Ryter, C. Angioni, et al., ''Experimental studies of electron transport'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''43''' (2001) A323]</ref> | ||
== | === [[Stellarator]]s === | ||
* W7-AS <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/40/1/002 U. Stroth, ''A comparative study of transport in stellarators and tokamaks'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''40''' (1998) 9]</ref> | * W7-AS <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/40/1/002 U. Stroth, ''A comparative study of transport in stellarators and tokamaks'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''40''' (1998) 9]</ref> | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
== Quantification methods == | == Quantification methods == | ||
=== Ad-hoc transport models === | |||
It is customary to introduce an ad-hoc transport model with a critical gradient (sharply enhanced transport above a critical value of the local gradient) to attempt to quantify the 'criticality' of transport: | It is customary to introduce an ad-hoc transport model with a critical gradient (sharply enhanced transport above a critical value of the local gradient) to attempt to quantify the 'criticality' of transport: | ||
Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/46/9/002 X. Garbet, P. Mantica, F. Ryter, et al., ''Profile stiffness and global confinement'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''46''' (2004) 1351]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/46/9/002 X. Garbet, P. Mantica, F. Ryter, et al., ''Profile stiffness and global confinement'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''46''' (2004) 1351]</ref> | ||
:<math>\chi = \chi_0 + \chi_1 \xi \left ( \frac{R}{L_T}-\frac{R}{L_{T,crit}}\right )^\alpha | :<math>\chi = \chi_0 + \chi_1 \xi \left ( \frac{R}{L_T}-\frac{R}{L_{T,crit}}\right )^\alpha H_{crit}</math> | ||
Here, ''H<sub> | Here, ''H<sub>crit</sub>'' is a step function (to activate supercritical transport), ''L<sub>T</sub> = T/∇ T'' is the temperature gradient scale length, and χ is the heat transport coefficient (χ<sub>0</sub> and χ<sub>1</sub> being the sub- and super-critical transport coefficients, and ξ the 'stiffness factor'). | ||
This sharply non-linear dependence of the transport coefficient on the relevant profile parameter (''L<sub>T</sub>'') makes the profiles 'stiff' in the sense that the gradients (''L<sub>T</sub>'') will change little in response to a large change in drive (the heat source) in the appropriate parameter range. | This sharply non-linear dependence of the transport coefficient on the relevant profile parameter (''L<sub>T</sub>'') makes the profiles 'stiff' in the sense that the gradients (''L<sub>T</sub>'') will change little in response to a large change in drive (the heat source) in the appropriate parameter range. | ||
The degree of stiffness can then be gauged by fitting the predictions of the ad-hoc model to experimental results, involving different heating schemes and/or heating modulation. | |||
=== Directly measuring stiffness === | |||
However, it is possible to devise methods for the objective quantification of profile stiffness that do not depend so much on the introduction of any ad-hoc model, simply by making this idea of stiffness explicit (i.e., by measuring the response of the gradient to a change in drive or heat source). | However, it is possible to devise methods for the objective quantification of profile stiffness that do not depend so much on the introduction of any ad-hoc model, simply by making this idea of stiffness explicit (i.e., by measuring the response of the gradient to a change in drive or heat source). | ||
<ref>[http://www.jspf.or.jp/PFR/PFR_articles/pfr2008S1/pfr2008_03-S1070.html B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Quantifying profile stiffness'', Plasma and Fusion Research, '''3''' (2008) S1070]</ref> | <ref>[http://www.jspf.or.jp/PFR/PFR_articles/pfr2008S1/pfr2008_03-S1070.html B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Quantifying profile stiffness'', Plasma and Fusion Research, '''3''' (2008) S1070]</ref> | ||
The [[:Wikipedia:Stiffness|general definition of stiffness of a system]] is | |||
:<math> \kappa = \frac{\Delta F}{\delta}</math> | |||
i.e., the stiffness ''κ'' is the applied force change ''Δ F'' divided by the system response (displacement) ''δ''. | |||
In the case at hand, the (thermodynamic) force or drive is the heat flux ''Q'', whereas the system response is the (thermodynamic) gradient ''∇ T'' (but see below). | |||
Another issue to take into account is that a useful measure of stiffness should depend on the quantities (''Δ F'' and ''δ'') in such a way that the extreme case of a totally stiff system would correspond to ''κ = ∞'' (''δ = 0''). | |||
Thus, assuming that profile stiffness is best evidenced in the normalized gradient (or inverse gradient length) ''∇ T / T'' (based on both experimental observation and, e.g., ETG instability theory), an appropriate stiffness definition for the temperature profile could be: | |||
:<math>\kappa = \frac{\Delta (Q/nT)}{\Delta (\nabla T / T)}</math> | |||
where the heat flux ''Q'' has been normalized by the pressure ''nT'' so that ''κ'' has the dimension of a heat diffusivity. | |||
The stiffness can thus be measured directly by observing the behaviour of the gradients as the drive (''Q'') is changed. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> |