4,383
edits
Neoclassical transport: Difference between revisions
m
→Limitations
m (→Limitations) |
m (→Limitations) |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* The linearity of the model. Neoclassical theory is a linear theory in which profiles are computed from sources and transport coefficients (that depend linearly on the profiles). No non-linear feedback of the profiles on the transport coefficients is contemplated. However, there are many exprimental studies that show that the profiles feed back non-linearly on the profiles (via [[Turbulence|turbulence]]), leading to some degree of [[Self-Organised Criticality|self-organisation]]. | * The linearity of the model. Neoclassical theory is a linear theory in which profiles are computed from sources and transport coefficients (that depend linearly on the profiles). No non-linear feedback of the profiles on the transport coefficients is contemplated. However, there are many exprimental studies that show that the profiles feed back non-linearly on the profiles (via [[Turbulence|turbulence]]), leading to some degree of [[Self-Organised Criticality|self-organisation]]. | ||
* Locality. Neoclassical theory is a theory of diffusion, and therefore it assumes that particle motion between collisions is small with respect to any other relevant spatial scales. This assumption then allows writing down differential equations, expressing the fluxes in terms of ''local'' gradients. It cannot be discarded that this basic assumption is violated under specific conditions, which may include the low-collisionality limit, and particles transported in ''streamers''. Typically, this would then give rise to ''super-diffusion''. | * Locality. Neoclassical theory is a theory of diffusion, and therefore it assumes that particle motion between collisions is small with respect to any other relevant spatial scales. This assumption then allows writing down differential equations, expressing the fluxes in terms of ''local'' gradients. It cannot be discarded that this basic assumption is violated under specific conditions, which may include the low-collisionality limit, and particles transported in ''streamers''. Typically, this would then give rise to ''super-diffusion''. | ||
* Markovianity. A second assumption underlying diffusive models (including Neoclassics) is Markovianity, implying that the motion of any particle is only determined by its current velocity and position. However, there are situations, such as stochastic magnetic field regions, persistent turbulent eddies, or transport barriers, where this assumption may be violated. Typically, this would then give rise to ''sub-diffusion''. | * Markovianity. A second assumption underlying diffusive models (including Neoclassics) is Markovianity, implying that the motion of any particle is only determined by its current velocity and position. However, there are situations, such as stochastic magnetic field regions, persistent turbulent eddies, or transport barriers, where this assumption may be violated (due to trapping effects, so that the preceding history of the particle trajectory becomes important). Typically, this would then give rise to ''sub-diffusion''. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||