Toroidal coordinates: Difference between revisions

Line 206: Line 206:
= \oint(\beta d\psi + d\chi)
= \oint(\beta d\psi + d\chi)
</math>
</math>
and choosing an integration circuit contained within a flux surface. We get
and choosing an integration circuit contained within a flux surface <math>(d\psi = 0)</math>. Then we get
:<math>
:<math>
\int_S \mu_0\mathbf{j}\cdot d\mathbf{S}
\int_S \mu_0\mathbf{j}\cdot d\mathbf{S}
Line 218: Line 218:
I_{pol}^d = \int_S \mu_0\mathbf{j}\cdot d\mathbf{S}\; ; ~\mathrm{with}~ \partial S ~\mathrm{such~that}~ (\Delta\theta = 0, \Delta\phi = 2\pi)~.
I_{pol}^d = \int_S \mu_0\mathbf{j}\cdot d\mathbf{S}\; ; ~\mathrm{with}~ \partial S ~\mathrm{such~that}~ (\Delta\theta = 0, \Delta\phi = 2\pi)~.
</math>
</math>
here the superscript <math>d</math> is meant to indicate the flux is computed through a disc limited by the integration line, as opposed to the ribbon limited by the integration line on one side and the magnetic axis on the other that was used for the definition of poloidal magnetic flux <math>\Psi_{po}l</math> above these lines.   
here the superscript <math>d</math> is meant to indicate the flux is computed through a disc limited by the integration line, as opposed to the ribbon limited by the integration line on one side and the magnetic axis on the other that was used for the definition of poloidal magnetic flux <math>\Psi_{pol}</math> above these lines.   
Similarly
Similarly
:<math>
:<math>
204

edits