76
edits
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement (view source)
Revision as of 13:46, 25 September 2016
, 25 September 2016no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I think it's clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only. | I think it's clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only. | ||
a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement. | a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement. | ||
then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in the balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimal useful frequency. | then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in the proper balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimal useful frequency. | ||
in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting linear devices, perhaps " | in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed. | ||
[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 14:39, 25 September 2016 (CEST) | |||