TJ-II:Comparison of transport of on-axis and off-axis ECH-heated plasmas: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
'''Motivation.'''
'''Motivation.'''


Particle transport of ECH plasmas is not well understood<ref>Dinklage 2013 NF</ref>, as neoclassical simulations seem to overestimate the radial particle flux of on-axis heated ECH-plasmas; on the other hand, preliminary analyses show that this problem does not exist for off-axis ECH-heated plasmas. A comparison between these two situations (including neoclassical and gyrokinetic simulations and corresponding measurements) may shed some light on this problem, probably relevant for assessing the fuelling requirements of reactor plasmas<ref>Maassberg 1999 NF</ref>. Even if the results along this line are finally not conclusive, the experimental and theoretical characterization of turbulence with different profiles (peaked/hollow <math>T_e</math> with hollow/peaked <math>n_e</math>) is itself relevant.
Particle transport of ECH plasmas<ref>Yokoyama 2005 NF</ref> is not well understood, as neoclassical simulations seem to overestimate the radial particle flux of on-axis heated ECH-plasmas; on the other hand, preliminary analyses show that this problem does not exist for off-axis ECH-heated plasmas. A comparison between these two situations (including neoclassical and gyrokinetic simulations and corresponding measurements) may shed some light on this problem, probably relevant for assessing the fuelling requirements of reactor plasmas<ref>Maassberg 1999 NF</ref>. Even if the results along this line are finally not conclusive, the experimental and theoretical characterization of turbulence with different profiles (peaked/hollow <math>T_e</math> with hollow/peaked <math>n_e</math>) is itself relevant. We will also have a look at impurity transport, as off-axis heated plasmas have been predicted to have negative radial electric field in the core and positive radial electric field closer to the edge, contrary to typical ECH plasmas.  


'''Objectives.'''  
'''Objectives.'''  
Line 24: Line 24:


We will compare the measurements with neoclassical and gyrokinetic simulations.
We will compare the measurements with neoclassical and gyrokinetic simulations.


== If applicable, International or National funding project or entity ==
== If applicable, International or National funding project or entity ==
Line 38: Line 36:
- The time evolution of the line-averaged density <math><n_e(t)></math> with interferometry.
- The time evolution of the line-averaged density <math><n_e(t)></math> with interferometry.


- The radial profiles of electron density <math>n_e(r,t_0)</math> and temperature <math>T_e(r,t_0)</math> at one time instant <math>t_0</math> with Thomson Scattering (TS).
- The radial profiles of electron density <math>n_e(r,t_0)</math> and temperature <math>T_e(r,t_0)</math> at one time instant <math>t_0</math> with Thomson Scattering (TS) and the He beam.


- The time evolution of the electron temperature profile <math>T_e(r,t)</math> with Electron Cyclotron Emission (ECE), when available, calibrated with TS.
- The time evolution of the electron temperature profile <math>T_e(r,t)</math> with Electron Cyclotron Emission (ECE), when available, calibrated with TS.
Line 67: Line 65:


[[Category:TJ-II internal documents]]
[[Category:TJ-II internal documents]]
[[Category:TJ-II experimental proposals]]
[[Category:TJ-II experimental proposals 2017]]

Navigation menu