Stellarator reactor: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
* The magnetic configuration can be specifically optimized to reduce transport
* The magnetic configuration can be specifically optimized to reduce transport
* Nearly complete external control of the configuration increases operational robustness and lessens the need for control and feedback systems
* Nearly complete external control of the configuration increases operational robustness and lessens the need for control and feedback systems
* Stellarator divertors, with long connection lengths and embedded magnetic islands, may mitigate heat loads on target plates by radiating some of the power


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 10:30, 9 September 2009

Although the main effort of the fusion community for the development of a fusion reactor is focused on the tokamak design (ITER), design studies have been made for a fusion reactor based on the stellarator design. [1] [2] [3] [4]

The main advantages of the stellarator concept over the tokamak concept are:

  • The density limit is 2 to 5 times higher
  • Performance ("beta") is not limited by disruptions. β values of up to 5% habe been achieved
  • ELMs occur but can be controlled by selecting the magnetic configuration (iota windows or magnetic field ergodicity)
  • The magnetic configuration can be specifically optimized to reduce transport
  • Nearly complete external control of the configuration increases operational robustness and lessens the need for control and feedback systems
  • Stellarator divertors, with long connection lengths and embedded magnetic islands, may mitigate heat loads on target plates by radiating some of the power

References