MHD equilibrium: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Here, the pressure ''p'' is assumed to be isotropic, but a generalization
Here, the pressure ''p'' is assumed to be isotropic, but a generalization
for non-isotropic pressure is possible.
for non-isotropic pressure is possible.
<ref>R.D. Hazeltine, J.D. Meiss, ''Plasma Confinement'', Courier Dover Publications (2003) ISBN 0486432424</ref>


In two dimensions (assuming axisymmetry), the force balance equation reduces to the  
In two dimensions (assuming axisymmetry), the force balance equation reduces to the  

Revision as of 18:00, 18 August 2009

The static, ideal Magneto-HydroDynamic (MHD) equilibrium of a near-Maxwellian magnetically confined plasma is obtained by solving the force balance equation

where

is the plasma current, subject to appropriate boundary conditions. The word "static" refers to the assumption of zero flow, while the word "ideal" refers to the absence of resistivity. Here, the pressure p is assumed to be isotropic, but a generalization for non-isotropic pressure is possible. [1]

In two dimensions (assuming axisymmetry), the force balance equation reduces to the Grad-Shafranov equation.

In three dimensions, the existence of flux surfaces (nested or not) is not guaranteed. [2]

A large number of codes is available to evaluate MHD equilibria.

2-D codes

3-D codes

  • VMEC (nested flux surfaces)
  • NEAR (nested flux surfaces)
  • IPEC (nested flux surfaces)
  • HINT (islands)
  • PIES (islands)
  • SIESTA (islands, fixed boundary)
  • BETA (finite difference)

References

  1. R.D. Hazeltine, J.D. Meiss, Plasma Confinement, Courier Dover Publications (2003) ISBN 0486432424
  2. H. Grad, Toroidal Containment of a Plasma, Phys. Fluids 10 (1967) 137