Flux coordinates: Difference between revisions

Line 162: Line 162:
The two identities above are the basic simplifying properties of the FSA: The first cancels the contribution of 'conservative forces' like the pressure gradient or electrostatic electric fields. The second reduces the number of spatial variables to only the radial one. Further, it is possible to show that, if <math>\nabla\cdot\Gamma = 0</math> then <math>\langle\Gamma\cdot\nabla V\rangle = 0</math> and not simply constant as the above suggest. This can be seen by simply using Gauss' theorem  
The two identities above are the basic simplifying properties of the FSA: The first cancels the contribution of 'conservative forces' like the pressure gradient or electrostatic electric fields. The second reduces the number of spatial variables to only the radial one. Further, it is possible to show that, if <math>\nabla\cdot\Gamma = 0</math> then <math>\langle\Gamma\cdot\nabla V\rangle = 0</math> and not simply constant as the above suggest. This can be seen by simply using Gauss' theorem  


*<math> \int_{\mathcal{V}}\nabla\cdot\Gamma\; d\mathcal{V} =  \langle\Gamma\cdot\nabla V\rangle = V'\langle\Gamma\cdot\nabla \psi\rangle \qquad \mathrm{where~} \mathcal{V} \mathrm{~is~the~volume~enclosed~by~a~flux~surface.}
*<math> \int_{\mathcal{V}}\nabla\cdot\Gamma\; d\mathcal{V} =  \langle\Gamma\cdot\nabla V\rangle \qquad \mathrm{where~} \mathcal{V} \mathrm{~is~the~volume~enclosed~by~a~flux~surface.}
</math>
</math>
The FSA relates to the conventional volume integral as
The FSA relates to the conventional volume integral as
204

edits