Bayesian data analysis: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/75/4237/1 R. Fischer, A. Dinklage, ''Integrated data analysis of fusion diagnostics by means of the Bayesian probability theory'', Rev. Sci. Instrum. '''75''' (2004) 4237]</ref><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WISP.2007.4447579 J. Svensson, A. Werner, ''Large Scale Bayesian Data Analysis for Nuclear Fusion Experiments'', IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing (2007) 1]</ref>
<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/75/4237/1 R. Fischer, A. Dinklage, ''Integrated data analysis of fusion diagnostics by means of the Bayesian probability theory'', Rev. Sci. Instrum. '''75''' (2004) 4237]</ref><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WISP.2007.4447579 J. Svensson, A. Werner, ''Large Scale Bayesian Data Analysis for Nuclear Fusion Experiments'', IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing (2007) 1]</ref>
Like [[Function parametrization]], this technique requires having a model to predict the measurement readings for any given state of the physical system; however, the handling of error propagation is more sophisticated with the Bayesian method, and additionally, it provides a systematic way to include prior knowledge into the analysis.
Like [[Function parametrization]], this technique requires having a model to predict the measurement readings for any given state of the physical system; however, the handling of error propagation is more sophisticated with the Bayesian method, and additionally, it provides a systematic way to include prior knowledge into the analysis.
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/45/7/304 R. Fischer, A. Dinklage, and E. Pasch, ''Bayesian modelling of fusion diagnostics'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''45''' (2003) 1095-1111]</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 17:26, 10 February 2010

The goal of Bayesian or integrated data analysis is to combine the information from a set of diagnostics providing complementary information in order to recover the best possible reconstruction of the actual state of the system subjected to measurement. [1][2] Like Function parametrization, this technique requires having a model to predict the measurement readings for any given state of the physical system; however, the handling of error propagation is more sophisticated with the Bayesian method, and additionally, it provides a systematic way to include prior knowledge into the analysis. [3]

References