Alternative fusion devices: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs. | Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs. | ||
Their common goal is to achieve fusion power generation at lower cost by exploiting the hypothetical improved plasma confinement properties of a different magnetic field configuration (or other design features), which would allow a reduced size of the power plant. | Their common goal is to achieve fusion power generation at lower cost by exploiting the hypothetical improved plasma confinement properties of a different magnetic field configuration (or other design features), which would allow a reduced size of the power plant. | ||
<ref>D. Clery, [[doi:10.1126/science.345.6195.370|Science ''345'', 6195 (2014) 370]]</ref> | <ref>D. Clery, [[doi:10.1126/science.345.6195.370|Science '''345''', 6195 (2014) 370]]</ref> | ||
<ref>[http://www.nature.com/news/plasma-physics-the-fusion-upstarts-1.15592 Plasma physics: The fusion upstarts, Nature '''511''', 7510 (2014)]</ref> | |||
Currently, none of the alternative designs have achieved these potential benefits. | Currently, none of the alternative designs have achieved these potential benefits. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
* [http://www.generalfusion.com/ General Fusion] | * [http://www.generalfusion.com/ General Fusion] | ||
* [http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/ LPP Fusion] Dense Plasma Focus | * [http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/ LPP Fusion] Dense Plasma Focus | ||
* [http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/compact-fusion.html Compact Fusion] (Lockheed Martin, Skunkworks)<ref>[http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2014/10/updated-are-old-secrets-behind-lockheeds-new-fusion-machine | * [http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/compact-fusion.html Compact Fusion] (Lockheed Martin, Skunkworks)<ref>[http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2014/10/updated-are-old-secrets-behind-lockheeds-new-fusion-machine D. Clery, ''Updated: Are old secrets behind Lockheed's new fusion machine?'', Science, 17 October 2014]</ref> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 08:06, 18 October 2014
Economically viable energy production based on nuclear fusion in a magnetic confinement device has not been demonstrated yet. The mainstream tokamak, stellarator, spheromak and Reversed Field Pinch designs may achieve energy production by fusion in the future, but it remains to be seen whether these designs will lead to economically viable and attractive power plants, as fusion reactors based on these designs will almost certainly need to be very large.
Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs. Their common goal is to achieve fusion power generation at lower cost by exploiting the hypothetical improved plasma confinement properties of a different magnetic field configuration (or other design features), which would allow a reduced size of the power plant. [1] [2] Currently, none of the alternative designs have achieved these potential benefits.
Alternative designs and associated companies
- Levitated Dipole Experiment
- Tri Alpha Energy
- Polywell (EMC2 company)
- General Fusion
- LPP Fusion Dense Plasma Focus
- Compact Fusion (Lockheed Martin, Skunkworks)[3]