Alternative fusion devices: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Economically viable energy production based on [[nuclear fusion]] in a [[magnetic confinement]] device  
Economically viable energy production based on [[nuclear fusion]] in a [[magnetic confinement]] device  
has not been demonstrated yet.
has not been demonstrated yet.
The mainstream [[tokamak]], [[stellarator]], [[spheromak]] and [[reversed field pinch]] designs may achieve energy production by fusion in the future, but it remains to be seen whether these designs will lead to economically viable and attractive power plants, as fusion reactors based on these designs will almost certainly need to be very large.
The mainstream [[tokamak]], [[stellarator]], [[spheromak]] and [[Reversed Field Pinch]] designs may achieve energy production by fusion in the future, but it remains to be seen whether these designs will lead to economically viable and attractive power plants, as fusion reactors based on these designs will almost certainly need to be very large.


Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs with the goal of achieving fusion at lower cost by exploiting hypothetical improved confiment properties, which would allow a reduced size of the power plant.
Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs with the goal of achieving fusion at lower cost by exploiting hypothetical improved confiment properties, which would allow a reduced size of the power plant.

Revision as of 21:58, 17 October 2014

Economically viable energy production based on nuclear fusion in a magnetic confinement device has not been demonstrated yet. The mainstream tokamak, stellarator, spheromak and Reversed Field Pinch designs may achieve energy production by fusion in the future, but it remains to be seen whether these designs will lead to economically viable and attractive power plants, as fusion reactors based on these designs will almost certainly need to be very large.

Given this situation, there is considerable interest in developing alternative designs with the goal of achieving fusion at lower cost by exploiting hypothetical improved confiment properties, which would allow a reduced size of the power plant. [1] Currently, none of the alternative designs have achieved these potential benefits.

Alternative designs and associated companies

References