Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:55, 14 July 2016 (CEST) | --[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:55, 14 July 2016 (CEST) | ||
The mentioned paper contains too many mistakes, and this text must be corrected. | |||
However, the proposed configurations of magnets remains the same. | |||
It seems to be possible a much more different approach, but it's too difficult to understand yet. | |||
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 13:26, 1 June 2020 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 12:26, 1 June 2020
untested project in an embryonic state.
for further information, you can visit: Nuclear Fusion: a different approach
to get a general idea on what the whole project is about, you can have a look directly at section 3 the single-pointed concept.
direct insight and some provisional notes at: Some Technical Details
feel free to post any kind of comment at the discussion of this page.
full paper: File:1 nuclear fusion - a different approach.pdf
--Solo (talk) 17:55, 14 July 2016 (CEST)
The mentioned paper contains too many mistakes, and this text must be corrected. However, the proposed configurations of magnets remains the same. It seems to be possible a much more different approach, but it's too difficult to understand yet. --Solo (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2020 (CEST)