Biorthogonal decomposition: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Relation with signal covariance == | == Relation with signal covariance == | ||
Assuming the signals ''j<sub> | Assuming the signals ''Y(i,j)'' have zero mean (their temporal average is zero, or Σ<sub>i</sub> ''Y(i,j)'' = 0), their [[:Wikipedia:Covariance|covariance]] is defined as: | ||
:<math>C(j_1,j_2) = \sum_i {Y(i,j_1)Y(i,j_2)},\!</math> | :<math>C(j_1,j_2) = \sum_i {Y(i,j_1)Y(i,j_2)},\!</math> |
Revision as of 07:24, 6 October 2010
The Biorthogonal Decomposition (BOD, also known as Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, POD[1]) applies to the analysis of multipoint measurements
where i=1,...,N is a temporal index and j=1,...,M a spatial index (typically). The time traces Y(i,j) for fixed j are usually sampled at a fixed rate (so t(i) is equidistant); however the measurement locations x(j) need not be ordered in any specific way.
The BOD decomposes the data matrix as follows:
where ψk is a 'chrono' (a temporal function) and φk a 'topo' (a spatial or detector-dependent function), such that the chronos and topos satisfy the following orthogonality relation
The combination chrono/topo at a given k, ψk(i) φk(j), is called a spatio-temporal 'mode' of the fluctuating system, and is constructed from the data matrix without any prejudice regarding the mode shape. The λk are the eigenvalues (sorted in decreasing order), where k=1,...,min(N,M), and directly represent the square root of the fluctuation energy contained in the corresponding mode. This decomposition is achieved using a standard Singular value decomposition of the data matrix Y(i,j):
where S is a diagonal N×M matrix and Skk = λk, the first min(N,M) columns of U (N×N) are the chronos and the first min(N,M) columns of V (M×M) are the topos.
Thus, the oscillations of the spatiotemporal fluctuating field are represented by means of a very small number of spatio-temporal modes that are constructed from the data themselves, without prejudice regarding the mode shape. [2]
A limitation of the technique is that it assumes space-time separability. This is not always the most appropriate assumption: e.g., travelling waves have a structure such as cos(kx-ωt); however, most propagating waves can still be recognised clearly by their distinct footprint in the biorthogonal modes (provided there are not too many): a travelling wave will produce a pair of modes with similar amplitude and a 90° phase difference.
Relation with signal covariance
Assuming the signals Y(i,j) have zero mean (their temporal average is zero, or Σi Y(i,j) = 0), their covariance is defined as:
Substituting the above expansion of Y and using the orthogonality relations, one obtains:
The technique is therefore ideally suited to perform cross covariance analyses of multipoint measurements.
By multiplying this expression for the covariance matrix C with the vector φk it is easy to show that the topos φk are the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix C, and λk2 the corresponding eigenvalues.
See also
References
- ↑ P. Holmes, J.L. Lumley, and G. Berkooz, Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press (1996) ISBN 0521634199
- ↑ T. Dudok de Wit et al., The biorthogonal decomposition as a tool for investigating fluctuations in plasmas, Phys. Plasmas 1 (1994) 3288