Stellarator optimization: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


Several optimization strategies have been developed and/or are being studied.
Several optimization strategies have been developed and/or are being studied.
<ref>[[doi:10.1063/1.2177643|H.E. Mynick, ''Transport optimization in stellarators'', Phys. Plasmas '''13''' (2006) 058102]]</ref>
<ref>H.E. Mynick, ''Transport optimization in stellarators'', [[doi:10.1063/1.2177643|Phys. Plasmas '''13''' (2006) 058102]]</ref>
* Optimization of [[Neoclassical transport]].<ref>[[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/35/8/001|H. Wobig, ''The theoretical basis of a drift-optimized stellarator reactor'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''35''' (1993) 903]]</ref> See [[omnigeneity]] and [[quasisymmetry]].
* Optimization of [[Neoclassical transport]].<ref>H. Wobig, ''The theoretical basis of a drift-optimized stellarator reactor'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/35/8/001|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''35''' (1993) 903]]</ref> See [[omnigeneity]] and [[quasisymmetry]].
* Optimization of [[Anomalous transport]].<ref>[[doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.095004|H.E. Mynick, N. Pomphrey, and P. Xanthopoulos, ''Optimizing Stellarators for Turbulent Transport'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''105''' (2010) 095004]]</ref>
* Optimization of [[Anomalous transport]].<ref>H.E. Mynick, N. Pomphrey, and P. Xanthopoulos, ''Optimizing Stellarators for Turbulent Transport'', [[doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.095004|Phys. Rev. Lett. '''105''' (2010) 095004]]</ref>
* Combined numerical approaches.<ref>[[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/55/1/014003|F. Castejón, A. Gómez-Iglesias, M.A. Vega-Rodríguez, J.A. Jiménez, J.L. Velasco and J.A. Romero, ''Stellarator optimization under several criteria using metaheuristics'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''55''' (2013) 014003]]</ref>


== Optimized stellarators ==
== Optimized stellarators ==


* [[W7-X]] - Neoclassical optimization; under construction
* [[W7-X]] - Neoclassical optimization; operational
* [http://www.hsx.wisc.edu/ HSX] - Quasihelical symmetry; operational
* [http://www.hsx.wisc.edu/ HSX] - Quasihelical symmetry; operational
* [http://web.utk.edu/~qps/ QPS] - Quasipoloidal symmetry; under construction
* [http://web.utk.edu/~qps/ QPS] - Quasipoloidal symmetry; cancelled
* [http://ncsx.pppl.gov/ NCSX] - Quasi-axisymmetry; cancelled
* [http://ncsx.pppl.gov/ NCSX] - Quasi-axisymmetry; cancelled
Also see: [http://web.ornl.gov/sci/fed/stelnews/pdf/PoP_proposal.pdf US Stellarator proof-of-principle program]


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 10:01, 7 May 2019

In tokamaks, a significant part of the confining magnetic field is produced by the currents flowing in the plasma itself. In contrast, the confining magnetic field of stellarators may be dominated by externally imposed magnetic fields (depending on the configuration). Since the confinement properties of toroidally confined devices depend sensitively on the magnetic field, the question arises whether this external control may be used to improve confinement properties, and thus facilitate the development of an economically attractive stellarator reactor.

Several optimization strategies have been developed and/or are being studied. [1]

Optimized stellarators

  • W7-X - Neoclassical optimization; operational
  • HSX - Quasihelical symmetry; operational
  • QPS - Quasipoloidal symmetry; cancelled
  • NCSX - Quasi-axisymmetry; cancelled

Also see: US Stellarator proof-of-principle program

References

  1. H.E. Mynick, Transport optimization in stellarators, Phys. Plasmas 13 (2006) 058102
  2. H. Wobig, The theoretical basis of a drift-optimized stellarator reactor, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 35 (1993) 903
  3. H.E. Mynick, N. Pomphrey, and P. Xanthopoulos, Optimizing Stellarators for Turbulent Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 095004