Hamada coordinates: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Otihizuv (Talk) to last revision by 130.206.40.141)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== Form of the Jacobian for Hamada coordinates ==
== Form of the Jacobian for Hamada coordinates ==
In this section, following D'haseleer et al we will translate the condition of straight current density lines into one for the '''Hamada''' coordinates Jacobian. For that we will make use of the equilibrium equation <math>\mathbf{j}\times\mathbf{B} = p'\nabla\psi </math>, which written in a magnetic coordinate system reads
In this section, following D'haseleer et al we will translate the condition of straight current density lines into one for the '''Hamada''' coordinates Jacobian. For that we will make use of the equilibrium equation <math>\mathbf{j}\times\mathbf{B} = p'\nabla\psi </math>, which written in a general magnetic coordinate system reads
:<math>
:<math>
\frac{-I'_{tor}\Psi'_{pol} + I'_{pol}\Psi'_{tor}}{4\pi^2\sqrt{g_f}}
\frac{-I'_{tor}\Psi'_{pol} + I'_{pol}\Psi'_{tor}}{4\pi^2\sqrt{g_f}}
- \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\tilde{\eta} = p'~.
- \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\tilde{\eta} = p'~.
</math>
</math>
Taking the [[Flux coordinates#flux surface average|flux surface average]] <math>\langle\cdot\rangle</math> of this equation we find <math>(-{I}'_{tor}{\Psi}'_{pol} + {I}'_{pol}{\Psi}'_{tor})= 4\pi^2{p}'\langle(\sqrt{g_f})^{-1}\rangle^{-1}</math>, so that we have
Taking the [[Flux coordinates#flux surface average|flux surface average]] <math>\langle\cdot\rangle</math> of this equation we find a synthetic version of the MHD equilibrium equation
:<math>(-{I}'_{tor}{\Psi}'_{pol} + {I}'_{pol}{\Psi}'_{tor})= 4\pi^2{p}'\langle(\sqrt{g_f})^{-1}\rangle^{-1} = p'V'~.
</math>
In the last identity we have used the general [[Flux coordinates#Useful properties of the FSA|property of the flux surface average]] <math>\langle\sqrt{g}^{-1}\rangle^{-1} = \frac{V'}{4\pi^2}</math>. Then, from the MHD equilibrium, we have
:<math> \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\tilde{\eta} = {p}'\left(\frac{\langle(\sqrt{g_f})^{-1}\rangle^{-1}}{\sqrt{g_f}}-1\right)
:<math> \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\tilde{\eta} = {p}'\left(\frac{{V'}/{4\pi^2}}{\sqrt{g_f}}-1\right)~,
</math>
</math>
where <math>\tilde{\eta}</math> and <math>\sqrt{g_f}</math> depend on our choice of coordinate system.


In a coordinate system where <math>\mathbf{j}</math> is straight <math>\tilde{\eta}</math> is a function of <math>\psi</math> only, and therefore LHS of this equation must be zero in such a system. It therefore follows that the Jacobian of the '''Hamada''' system must satisfy  
Now, in the '''Hamada''' magnetic coordinate system that concerns us here (that in which <math>\mathbf{j}</math> is straight) <math>\tilde{\eta}</math> is a function of <math>\psi</math> only, and therefore LHS of this equation must be zero in such a system. It follows that the Jacobian of the Hamada system must satisfy  
:<math>
:<math>
  \sqrt{g_H} = \langle\sqrt{g_H}^{-1}\rangle^{-1} = \frac{V'}{4\pi^2}~,
  \sqrt{g_H} = \frac{V'}{4\pi^2}~.
 
</math>
</math>
where the last identity follows from the [[Flux coordinates#Useful properties of the FSA|properties of the flux surface average]]. The Hamada angles are sometimes defined in 'turns' (i.e. <math>(\theta, \xi) \in [0,1)</math>) instead of radians (<math>(\theta, \xi) \in [0,2\pi)</math>)). This choice together with the choice of the volume <math>V</math> as radial coordinate makes the Jacobian equal to unity. Alternatively one can select <math>\psi = \frac{V}{4\pi^2}</math> as radial coordinate with the same effect.
 
The Hamada angles are sometimes defined in 'turns' (i.e. <math>(\theta, \xi) \in [0,1)</math>) instead of radians (<math>(\theta, \xi) \in [0,2\pi)</math>)). This choice together with the choice of the volume <math>V</math> as radial coordinate makes the Jacobian equal to unity. Alternatively one can select <math>\psi = \frac{V}{4\pi^2}</math> as radial coordinate with the same effect.


== Magnetic field and current density expressions in a Hamada vector basis ==
== Magnetic field and current density expressions in a Hamada vector basis ==

Latest revision as of 10:59, 12 August 2011

Hamada coordinates are a set of magnetic coordinates in which the equilibrium current density lines are straight besides those of magnetic field . The periodic part of the stream functions of both and are flux functions (that can be chosen to be zero without loss of generality).

Form of the Jacobian for Hamada coordinates

In this section, following D'haseleer et al we will translate the condition of straight current density lines into one for the Hamada coordinates Jacobian. For that we will make use of the equilibrium equation , which written in a general magnetic coordinate system reads

Taking the flux surface average of this equation we find a synthetic version of the MHD equilibrium equation

In the last identity we have used the general property of the flux surface average . Then, from the MHD equilibrium, we have

where and depend on our choice of coordinate system.

Now, in the Hamada magnetic coordinate system that concerns us here (that in which is straight) is a function of only, and therefore LHS of this equation must be zero in such a system. It follows that the Jacobian of the Hamada system must satisfy

The Hamada angles are sometimes defined in 'turns' (i.e. ) instead of radians ()). This choice together with the choice of the volume as radial coordinate makes the Jacobian equal to unity. Alternatively one can select as radial coordinate with the same effect.

Magnetic field and current density expressions in a Hamada vector basis

With the form of the Hamada coordinates' Jacobian we can now write the explicit contravariant form of the magnetic field in terms of the Hamada basis vectors

This has the nice property of having flux constant contravariant coefficients (functions of the radial coordinate only). The current density contravariant looks alike

The covariant expression of the magnetic field is less clean

with contributions from the periodic part of the magnetic scalar potential to all the covariant components. Nonetheless, the flux surface averaged Hamada covariant -field angular components have simple expressions, i.e

where the integral over is zero because the Jacobian in Hamada coordinates is not a function of this angle. Similarly