Stellarator reactor: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Although the main effort of the fusion community for the development of a fusion reactor is focused on the tokamak design (ITER), design studies have been made for a fusion r…')
 
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Although the main effort of the fusion community for the development of a fusion reactor is focused on the tokamak design ([[ITER]]), design studies have been made for a fusion reactor based on the stellarator design.
Although the main effort of the fusion community for the development of a fusion reactor is focused on the [[Tokamak|tokamak]] design ([[ITER]]), design studies have been made for a fusion reactor based on the [[Stellarator|stellarator]] design.
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.008 R.C. Wolf et al, ''A stellarator reactor based on the optimization criteria of Wendelstein 7-X'', Fusion Engineering and Design '''83''', Issues 7-9 (2008) 990-996]</ref>
<ref>H. Wobig, ''The theoretical basis of a drift-optimized stellarator reactor'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/35/8/001|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''35''' (1993) 903-917]]</ref>
<ref>J.F. Lyon and G.H. Neilson, '' Compact Stellarators'',  [[doi:10.1023/A:1021841825478|Journal of Fusion Energy '''17''', 3 (1998) 189-191]]</ref>
<ref>G.H. Neilson et al, ''Physics issues in the design of high-beta, low-aspect-ratio stellarator experiments'', [[doi:10.1063/1.874015|Phys. Plasmas '''7''' (2000) 1911]]</ref>
<ref>C.D. Beidler et al, ''Stellarator Fusion Reactors - an overview'', [http://www.jspf.or.jp/JPFRS/PDF/Vol5/jpfrs2002_05-149.pdf J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES '''5''' (2002) 149-155]</ref>
<ref>H. Wobig and F. Wagner, [[doi:10857629_17|''Nuclear Energy. Chapter 7, Magnetic confinement fusion: stellarator'' (2005)]] {{ISBN|978-3-540-42891-6}}</ref>
<ref>R.C. Wolf et al, ''A stellarator reactor based on the optimization criteria of Wendelstein 7-X'', [[doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.008|Fusion Engineering and Design '''83''', Issues 7-9 (2008) 990-996]]</ref>
 
The main advantages of the stellarator concept over the tokamak concept are:
* The [[Greenwald limit|density limit]] is 2 to 5 times higher
* Performance ([[Beta|beta]] or &beta;) is not limited by [[Disruption|disruptions]]. &beta; values of up to 5% have been achieved
* Access to continuous operation due to the reduced amplitude or absence of net plasma current
* [[Edge Localized Modes|ELMs]] occur but can be controlled by selecting the magnetic configuration ([[Magnetic shear|iota]] windows or magnetic field ergodicity)
* The magnetic configuration can be specifically optimized to reduce transport
* Nearly complete external control of the configuration increases operational robustness and lessens the need for control and feedback systems
* Stellarator [[Divertor|divertors]], with long connection lengths and embedded magnetic islands, may mitigate heat loads on target plates by radiating some of the power


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 11:38, 26 January 2023

Although the main effort of the fusion community for the development of a fusion reactor is focused on the tokamak design (ITER), design studies have been made for a fusion reactor based on the stellarator design. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

The main advantages of the stellarator concept over the tokamak concept are:

  • The density limit is 2 to 5 times higher
  • Performance (beta or β) is not limited by disruptions. β values of up to 5% have been achieved
  • Access to continuous operation due to the reduced amplitude or absence of net plasma current
  • ELMs occur but can be controlled by selecting the magnetic configuration (iota windows or magnetic field ergodicity)
  • The magnetic configuration can be specifically optimized to reduce transport
  • Nearly complete external control of the configuration increases operational robustness and lessens the need for control and feedback systems
  • Stellarator divertors, with long connection lengths and embedded magnetic islands, may mitigate heat loads on target plates by radiating some of the power

References

  1. H. Wobig, The theoretical basis of a drift-optimized stellarator reactor, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 35 (1993) 903-917
  2. J.F. Lyon and G.H. Neilson, Compact Stellarators, Journal of Fusion Energy 17, 3 (1998) 189-191
  3. G.H. Neilson et al, Physics issues in the design of high-beta, low-aspect-ratio stellarator experiments, Phys. Plasmas 7 (2000) 1911
  4. C.D. Beidler et al, Stellarator Fusion Reactors - an overview, J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES 5 (2002) 149-155
  5. H. Wobig and F. Wagner, Nuclear Energy. Chapter 7, Magnetic confinement fusion: stellarator (2005) ISBN 978-3-540-42891-6
  6. R.C. Wolf et al, A stellarator reactor based on the optimization criteria of Wendelstein 7-X, Fusion Engineering and Design 83, Issues 7-9 (2008) 990-996