Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:




Untested Project in embryo state.
untested project in an embryonic state.






For further information, you can visit:  [https://sites.google.com/site/asingleapproach/ Nuclear Fusion: a different approach]
for further information, you can visit:  [https://sites.google.com/site/asingleapproach/ Nuclear Fusion: a different approach]


To get a general idea on what the whole project is about, you can take a look directly at section '''3 the single-pointed concept'''.
to get a general idea on what the whole project is about, you can have a look directly at section '''3 the single-pointed concept'''.






Direct insight at: [https://sites.google.com/site/asingleapproachboard/ Some Technical Details]
'''direct insight''' and some provisional notes at: [https://sites.google.com/site/asingleapproachboard/ Some Technical Details]


feel free to post any kind of comment at the '''discussion''' of this page.


Full text: [[File:1 nuclear fusion - a different approach.pdf]]




[http://fusionwiki.ciemat.es/wiki/User:Solo55 Oscar S. De Rus]


--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:55, 14 July 2016 (CEST)


--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 20:35, 28 June 2016 (CEST)
The mentioned paper contains too many mistakes, and this text must be corrected.
However, the proposed configurations of magnets remains the same.
It seems to be possible a much more different approach, but it's too difficult to understand yet.
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 13:26, 1 June 2020 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 16:38, 1 March 2021


untested project in an embryonic state.


for further information, you can visit: Nuclear Fusion: a different approach

to get a general idea on what the whole project is about, you can have a look directly at section 3 the single-pointed concept.


direct insight and some provisional notes at: Some Technical Details

feel free to post any kind of comment at the discussion of this page.



--Solo (talk) 17:55, 14 July 2016 (CEST)

The mentioned paper contains too many mistakes, and this text must be corrected. However, the proposed configurations of magnets remains the same. It seems to be possible a much more different approach, but it's too difficult to understand yet. --Solo (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2020 (CEST)