Bicoherence: Difference between revisions

From FusionWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Corrected references
 
Line 70: Line 70:
The two-dimensional bicoherence graph tends to show mainly two types of structures:
The two-dimensional bicoherence graph tends to show mainly two types of structures:
* 'Points': indicating sharply defined, unchanging, locked frequencies.
* 'Points': indicating sharply defined, unchanging, locked frequencies.
* 'Lines': these are more difficult to interpret. It is often stated that 'lines' are due to single mode (frequency) interacting with a broad range of frequencies (e.g., a [[Geodesic Acoustic Mode]] and broad-band turbulence<ref>Y. Nagashima et al, ''Observation of coherent bicoherence and biphase in potential fluctuations around geodesic acoustic mode frequency on JFT-2M'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/48/5A/S38|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''48''' (2006) A377]]</ref>) - but it is not evident that this is the only explanation. Particularly, two interacting oscillators (continuously exchanging energy) ''also'' produce lines in the bicoherence graph.<ref name="milligen1995"></ref><ref>B.Ph. van Milligen, L. García, B.A. Carreras, M.A. Pedrosa, C. Hidalgo, J.A. Alonso, T. Estrada and E. Ascasíbar, MHD mode activity and the velocity shear layer at TJ-II, [[doi:10.1088/0029-5515/52/1/013006|Nucl. Fusion 52 (2012) 013006]]</ref>
* 'Lines': these are more difficult to interpret. It is often stated that 'lines' are due to single mode (frequency) interacting with a broad range of frequencies (e.g., a [[Geodesic Acoustic Mode]] and broad-band turbulence<ref>Y. Nagashima et al, ''Observation of coherent bicoherence and biphase in potential fluctuations around geodesic acoustic mode frequency on JFT-2M'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/48/5A/S38|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''48''' (2006) A377]]</ref>) - but it is not evident that this is the only explanation. Particularly, two interacting oscillators (continuously exchanging energy) ''also'' produce lines in the bicoherence graph.<ref name="milligen1995"></ref><ref>B.Ph. van Milligen, L. García, B.A. Carreras, M.A. Pedrosa, C. Hidalgo, J.A. Alonso, T. Estrada and E. Ascasíbar, ''MHD mode activity and the velocity shear layer at TJ-II'', [[doi:10.1088/0029-5515/52/1/013006|Nucl. Fusion 52 (2012) 013006]]</ref>


== Notes ==
== Notes ==

Latest revision as of 13:10, 10 June 2019

The following applies to the analysis of data or signals

Xi(t)

For convenience and simplicity of notation, the data can be taken to have zero mean (Xi=0) and unit standard deviation (Xi2=1).

The standard cross spectrum is the Fourier transform of the correlation

C1(t1)=X1(t)X2(t+t1)

where the square brackets imply averaging over t. Similarly, the bispectrum is the Fourier transform of the bicorrelation

C2(t1,t2)=X1(t)X2(t+t1)X2(t+t2)

The signals Xi can either be different or identical. In the latter case, one speaks of the autocorrelation, autospectrum, auto-bicorrelation or auto-bispectrum.

Bispectrum

The Fourier transforms of the signals Xi(t) are denoted by

X^i(ω)

Thus, the bispectrum, computed as the Fourier transform of the bicorrelation C2, becomes:

B(ω1,ω2)=X^1*(ω)X^2(ω1)X^2(ω2)

where

ω=ω1+ω2

Hence, the bispectrum is interpreted as a measure of the degree of three-wave coupling.

Bicoherence

The bicoherence is obtained by averaging the bispectrum over statistically equivalent realizations, and normalizing the result:

b2(ω1,ω2)=|B(ω1,ω2)|2|X^1(ω)|2|X^2(ω1)X^2(ω2)|2

The normalization is such that 0 ≤ b2 ≤ 1.

The bicoherence is symmetric under the transformations 12) → (ω21) and 12) → (-ω1,-ω2), so that only one quarter of the plane 12) contains independent information. Additionally, for discretely sampled data all frequencies must be less than the Nyquist frequency: 1|,|ω2|,|ω| ≤ ωNyq. These restrictions define a polygonal subspace of the plane, which is how the bicoherence is usually represented (for an example, see TJ-II:Turbulence).

The summed bicoherence is defined by

1N(ω)ω1+ω2=ωb2(ω1,ω2)

where N is the number of terms in the sum. Similarly, the total mean bicoherence is

1Ntotω1,ω2b2(ω1,ω2)

where Ntot is the number of terms in the sum.

Interpretation

The bicoherence measures three-wave coupling and is only large when the phase between the wave at ω and the sum wave ω12 is nearly constant over a significant number of realizations.

The two-dimensional bicoherence graph tends to show mainly two types of structures:

  • 'Points': indicating sharply defined, unchanging, locked frequencies.
  • 'Lines': these are more difficult to interpret. It is often stated that 'lines' are due to single mode (frequency) interacting with a broad range of frequencies (e.g., a Geodesic Acoustic Mode and broad-band turbulence[1]) - but it is not evident that this is the only explanation. Particularly, two interacting oscillators (continuously exchanging energy) also produce lines in the bicoherence graph.[2][3]

Notes

  • The bicoherence can be computed using the (continuous) wavelet transform instead of the Fourier transform, in order to improve statistics. [2]
  • The bicoherence can of course be defined in wavenumber space instead of frequency space by applying the replacements t → x and ω → k.
  • Combined temporal-spatial studies are also possible. [4]

Starting from the spatio-temporal bicorrelation

C22(x1,x2,t1,t2)=X1(x,t)X2(x+x1,t+t1)X2(x+x2,t+t2)

the spatio-temporal bispectrum is

B2(k1,k2,ω1,ω2)=X^1*(k,ω)X^2(k1,ω1)X^2(k2,ω2)

where ω=ω1+ω2 and k=k1+k2.

References

  1. Y. Nagashima et al, Observation of coherent bicoherence and biphase in potential fluctuations around geodesic acoustic mode frequency on JFT-2M, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48 (2006) A377
  2. 2.0 2.1 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, Wavelet bicoherence: a new turbulence analysis tool, Phys. Plasmas 2, 8 (1995) 3017
  3. B.Ph. van Milligen, L. García, B.A. Carreras, M.A. Pedrosa, C. Hidalgo, J.A. Alonso, T. Estrada and E. Ascasíbar, MHD mode activity and the velocity shear layer at TJ-II, Nucl. Fusion 52 (2012) 013006
  4. T. Yamada, S.-I. Itoh, S. Inagaki, Y. Nagashima, S. Shinohara, N. Kasuya, K. Terasaka, K. Kamataki, H. Arakawa, M. Yagi, A. Fujisawa, and K. Itoh, Two-dimensional bispectral analysis of drift wave turbulence in a cylindrical plasma , Phys. Plasmas 17 (2010) 052313