TJ-II:Radiation asymmetries and potential variations: Difference between revisions
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) |
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
varies according to their adiabatic response and can be written as: <math>n_{a0}=\left<n\right>\exp\left(-Z_{a}e\Phi_1/T_{a}\right)</math>, with | varies according to their adiabatic response and can be written as: <math>n_{a0}=\left<n\right>\exp\left(-Z_{a}e\Phi_1/T_{a}\right)</math>, with | ||
<math>\left<...\right></math> the flux-surface-average. In TJ-II plasmas experiments and simulations | <math>\left<...\right></math> the flux-surface-average. In TJ-II plasmas experiments and simulations | ||
<ref>M A Pedrosa ''et al.'', ''Electrostatic potential variations along flux surfaces in stellarators'' Nucl. Fusion '''55''' 052001 (2015) </ref> | <ref>M. A. Pedrosa ''et al.'', ''Electrostatic potential variations along flux surfaces in stellarators'' Nucl. Fusion '''55''' 052001 (2015) </ref> | ||
<ref> | <ref>J. M. Garcı́a-Regaña ''et al.'' ''Electrostatic potential variation on the flux surface and its impact on impurity transport'' Nuclear Fusion '''57''' 056004 (2017)</ref> | ||
have shown that <math>e\Phi_1/T_{a}</math> can take values from <math>O(0.01)</math> to <math>O(0.1)</math>. Variations are predicted to be | have shown that <math>e\Phi_1/T_{a}</math> can take values from <math>O(0.01)</math> to <math>O(0.1)</math>. Variations are predicted to be | ||
larger at the outer radii than at the inner core, and stronger in ECRH plasmas than in NBI plasmas. Under | larger at the outer radii than at the inner core, and stronger in ECRH plasmas than in NBI plasmas. Under | ||
Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
system <ref> M. A. Ochando ''et al.'' ''Up-down and in-out asymmetry monitoring based on broadband radiation detectors'' Fusion Sci. and Technol. '''50''' 313 (2006) </ref> after the inyection | system <ref> M. A. Ochando ''et al.'' ''Up-down and in-out asymmetry monitoring based on broadband radiation detectors'' Fusion Sci. and Technol. '''50''' 313 (2006) </ref> after the inyection | ||
of some selected impurities by gas puffing is proposed. The experiment aims at studying the relation between the radially asymmetric | of some selected impurities by gas puffing is proposed. The experiment aims at studying the relation between the radially asymmetric | ||
emissivity and the measured and predicted <math>\Phi_1</math> and compare this with the case where <math>\Phi_1</math> is neglected | emissivity and the measured and predicted <math>\Phi_1</math> and compare this with the case where <math>\Phi_1</math> is neglected | ||
<ref> J. A. Alonso ''et al.'' ''Parallel impurity dynamics in the TJ-II stellarator'' Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. '''58'''(7) (2016). | <ref> J. A. Alonso ''et al.'' ''Parallel impurity dynamics in the TJ-II stellarator'' Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. '''58'''(7) 074009 (2016)</ref>. | ||
The measurement and evolution of <math>\Phi_1</math> will be tracked | The measurement and evolution of <math>\Phi_1</math> will be tracked | ||
during the discharges using the duplicated Langmuir probe system plasma floating potential measurements. | during the discharges using the duplicated Langmuir probe system plasma floating potential measurements. |
Revision as of 14:14, 6 March 2018
Experimental campaign
2018 Spring
Proposal title
Impurity dynamics, radiation asymmetries and potential variations
Name and affiliation of proponents
José M García Regaña1, D. Carralero1, M. A. Ochando1, T. Estrada1, F. Medina1, José Luis Velasco1, J. A. Alonso 1, ...
Details of contact person at LNF (if applicable)
Enter contact person here or N/A
Description of the activity, including motivation/objectives and experience of the proponent (typically one-two pages)
Neoclassical theory predicts a non-constant portion of the electrostatic potential over the flux surfaces [1], usually denoted by , with and the poloidal and toroidal angular coordinates. When this is taken into account the equilibrium density of the different species a present in the plasma varies according to their adiabatic response and can be written as: Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle n_{a0}=\left<n\right>\exp\left(-Z_{a}e\Phi_1/T_{a}\right)} , with Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left<...\right>} the flux-surface-average. In TJ-II plasmas experiments and simulations [2] [3] have shown that can take values from to . Variations are predicted to be larger at the outer radii than at the inner core, and stronger in ECRH plasmas than in NBI plasmas. Under conditions with large the impurities of moderate to high should experience strong variations of their densities over the flux surfaces, increasing with . These, in turn, should result in an anisotropic radiation over each flux surface and consequently a radially asymmetric radiation pattern should follow.
In the present experiment the analysis of the radial profiles and time evolution of the plasma emissivity using the TJ-II bolometry system [4] after the inyection of some selected impurities by gas puffing is proposed. The experiment aims at studying the relation between the radially asymmetric emissivity and the measured and predicted and compare this with the case where is neglected [5]. The measurement and evolution of will be tracked during the discharges using the duplicated Langmuir probe system plasma floating potential measurements. Numerical calculations of will be carried out with the neoclassical version of the code EUTERPE at different radial locations.
Description of required resources
The required signals to perform the analysis are:
- The time evolution of the plasma emissivity radial profile via tomographic reconstructions of the bolometry system signals.
- The time evolution of the plasma floating potential at the outer core region ().
- The time evolution of the line-averaged density Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left<n_e(t)\right>} with interferometry.
- The radial profiles of electron density and temperature at one time instant using Thomson Scattering (TS).
- The time evolution of the electron temperature profile with Electron Cyclotron Emission (ECE), when available, calibrated with TS.
- The time evolution of the ion temperature in the core and in an outer radial position and with the Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA).
- The time evolution of the radial electric field at the mid-outer resion () with reflectometry.
- The time evolution of the electrostatic potential in the mid-outer region with the double Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP).
Other constraints regarding the desired experimental conditions are:
- ECH is the main and only heating scheme that will be employed. Accessing the regimes detailed in the following line will be realized by the usage of different power and off-axis heating when necessary.
- A total of 20 discharges are estimated to be the minimum required.
- The injection of impurities by means of LBO or puffing is required, in order to track the impact and evolution of the bolometry radiation signals, and correlated with the measurement and predictions of the potential variations and radial electric field.
- Accessing different absolute values and regimes is essential. These regimes can be roughly referred to as "high ion root ", "low ion root " and the same for electron root conditions. 2 discharges per regime are required in order to characterize at different positions over the same flux surface.
- Reproducing some of these regimes in two different configurations (high-iota and standard), where changes in the the sign of have been observed, is planned.
- Good stationarity of plasma parameters at the instant where the impurities are injected is required in order to extract the stationary background emissivity from that produced by the injected impurity. Hence the study shall preferably be perform in ECRH plasmas.
Preferred dates and degree of flexibility
Preferred dates: due to the availability on-site of the proponents the experimental days should fall out of the calender weeks 14, 17, 18 and 19.
References
- ↑ H. Mynick Calculation of the poloidal ambipolar field in a stellarator and its effect on transport Phys. Fluids 27(8) 2086 (1984)
- ↑ M. A. Pedrosa et al., Electrostatic potential variations along flux surfaces in stellarators Nucl. Fusion 55 052001 (2015)
- ↑ J. M. Garcı́a-Regaña et al. Electrostatic potential variation on the flux surface and its impact on impurity transport Nuclear Fusion 57 056004 (2017)
- ↑ M. A. Ochando et al. Up-down and in-out asymmetry monitoring based on broadband radiation detectors Fusion Sci. and Technol. 50 313 (2006)
- ↑ J. A. Alonso et al. Parallel impurity dynamics in the TJ-II stellarator Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 58(7) 074009 (2016)