Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions

Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement (view source)

18 bytes added , 25 September 2016

no edit summary

76

edits

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 [[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 17:07, 4 March 2016 (CET)
-I think it's clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only, since a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement.
+now I think it's probably clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only, since a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement.
 then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in the proper balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimum of useful frequency.
-in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed.
+in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting many linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed.
 [[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 14:39, 25 September 2016 (CEST)