Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 34: Line 34:


All previous hypotheses are wrong.  
All previous hypotheses are wrong.  
They are no more than speculations with no technical usefulness.
They are no more than speculations with no technical basis.
It seems that the proposed configurations requires a very different approach.
It seems that the proposed configurations require a very different approach.
Though these magnets seem to generate a null field at the central area,  
Though these magnets seem to generate a null field at the central area,  
direct current would produce confinement losses when applied to them  
direct current would produce confinement losses when applied to them  
or, at their best, particles recirculation with a same loss as a result.
or, at their best, particles recirculation with a same loss as a result.
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 13:18, 1 June 2020 (CEST)
--[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 13:18, 1 June 2020 (CEST)
76

edits