TJ-II:Impurity density and potential asymmetries: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-33-36.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 1.  
[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-32-57.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 1.  
Numerical vs Experiment electron-root #45477 discharge:
Numerical vs Experiment electron-root #45477 discharge:
(a,b) Numerical impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the
(a,b) Numerical impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the
Line 16: Line 16:
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]]
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]]


[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-32-57.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 2. Same as in figure 1. but considering the ion-root discharge #45477 <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport
[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-33-36.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 2. Same as in figure 1. but considering the ion-root discharge #45477 <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]]
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]]


124

edits