TJ-II:Dependence of NBI-driven Alfvén Eigenmodes on NBI energy and power: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


== Name and affiliation of proponent ==
== Name and affiliation of proponent ==
Á. Cappa, E. Ascasíbar, M. Liniers  LNF-CIEMAT
Á. Cappa, E. Ascasíbar, M. Liniers, F.Castejón  
 
LNF-CIEMAT


== Details of contact person at LNF (if applicable) ==
== Details of contact person at LNF (if applicable) ==
Line 24: Line 26:
the NBI phase in order to control the plasma density.             
the NBI phase in order to control the plasma density.             


*Target plasma using ECRH, then ECRH is switched off and only used if good density control is not achieved.
*Target plasma using ECRH, then ECRH is switched off and only used if good density control is not achieved.  


*Three different values of NBI power shall be used, using the same power in both injectors and the same voltage-current pair.
*Three different values of NBI power shall be used, using the same power in both injectors and the same voltage-current pair.
Line 31: Line 33:
constant plasma current which ideally should mainly come from the bootstrap contribution.  
constant plasma current which ideally should mainly come from the bootstrap contribution.  


*Two reproducible shots per voltage
*Two reproducible shots per voltage. Alternatively, the length of one of the beams may be 20-30 ms shorter than the
other one in order to isolate the mode excitation that corresponds to each beam and identify which beam drives which modes.


*24 shots in total. One day of operation.
*24 shots in total. One day of operation.
Line 59: Line 62:


[[Category:TJ-II internal documents]]
[[Category:TJ-II internal documents]]
[[Category:TJ-II experimental proposals]]
[[Category:TJ-II experimental proposals Spring 2018]]