H-mode: Difference between revisions

8 bytes added ,  25 August 2009
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(97)80039-6 D.N. Hill, ''A review of ELMs in divertor tokamaks'', Journal of Nuclear Materials '''241-243''' (1997) 182-198]</ref>
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(97)80039-6 D.N. Hill, ''A review of ELMs in divertor tokamaks'', Journal of Nuclear Materials '''241-243''' (1997) 182-198]</ref>
The ELMy H-mode is proposed as the standard operating scenario for [[ITER]], thus converting ELM mitigation into a priority.
The ELMy H-mode is proposed as the standard operating scenario for [[ITER]], thus converting ELM mitigation into a priority.
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/123/1/012002 N. Oyama, ''Progress and issues in understanding the physics of ELM dynamics, ELM mitigation, and ELM control'', J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. '''123''' (2008) 012002]</ref>
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.01.063 M.R. Wade, ''Physics and engineering issues associated with edge localized mode control in ITER'', Fusion Engineering and Design '''84''', Issues 2-6 (2009) 178-185]</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />