Flux coordinates: Difference between revisions

Line 178: Line 178:
If we consider an equilibrium magnetic field such that <math> \mathbf{j}\times\mathbf{B} \propto \nabla\psi</math>, where <math> \mathbf{j}</math> is the current density , then both <math> \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\psi = 0</math> and <math> \nabla\times\mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\psi = 0</math> and the magnetic field can be written as
If we consider an equilibrium magnetic field such that <math> \mathbf{j}\times\mathbf{B} \propto \nabla\psi</math>, where <math> \mathbf{j}</math> is the current density , then both <math> \mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\psi = 0</math> and <math> \nabla\times\mathbf{B}\cdot\nabla\psi = 0</math> and the magnetic field can be written as
:<math>
:<math>
\mathbf{B} = \beta\nabla\psi + \nabla\chi
\mathbf{B} = -\eta\nabla\psi + \nabla\chi
</math>
</math>
where <math>\chi</math> is identified as the magnetic ''scalar'' potential. Its general form is
where <math>\chi</math> is identified as the magnetic ''scalar'' potential. Its general form is
Line 228: Line 228:
</math>
</math>
where the integral is performed along the magnetic axis.
where the integral is performed along the magnetic axis.
According to our definitions, <math>\beta</math> in the covariant form of the magnetic field relates to the current stream function <math>\eta</math> as <math>\beta = -\mu_0\eta</math>


== Magnetic coordinates ==
== Magnetic coordinates ==
204

edits