4,427
edits
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
The main numerical advantage of the FDE approach over the GME is that the FDE allows constructing the final solution in the long-time limit by a single integration, | The main numerical advantage of the FDE approach over the GME is that the FDE allows constructing the final solution in the long-time limit by a single integration, | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.008 V.E. Lynch et al, ''Numerical methods for the solution of partial differential equations of fractional order'', Journal of Computational Physics '''192''', 2 (2003) 406-421]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.008 V.E. Lynch et al, ''Numerical methods for the solution of partial differential equations of fractional order'', Journal of Computational Physics '''192''', 2 (2003) 406-421]</ref> | ||
whereas the GME must be iterated in time. On the other hand, the FDE approach does not capture some of the (interesting) dynamical behaviour inherent in the GME approach. | whereas the GME must be iterated in time. | ||
The FDE approach can be used fruitfully to model transport in fusion plasmas, in finite-size systems. | |||
<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/13/082308/1 D. del-Castillo-Negrete, ''Fractional diffusion models of nonlocal transport'', Phys. Plasmas '''13''' (2006) 082308]</ref> | |||
On the other hand, the FDE approach does not capture some of the (interesting) dynamical behaviour inherent in the GME approach. | |||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/3/004 B.Ph. van Milligen, B.A. Carreras, V.E. Lynch and R. Sánchez, ''Pulse propagation in a simple probabilistic transport model'', Nucl. Fusion '''47''' (2007) 189]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/3/004 B.Ph. van Milligen, B.A. Carreras, V.E. Lynch and R. Sánchez, ''Pulse propagation in a simple probabilistic transport model'', Nucl. Fusion '''47''' (2007) 189]</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> |