124
edits
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jose.regana (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
2017 Spring | 2017 Spring | ||
[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-33-36.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 1. | |||
Numerical vs Experiment electron-root #45477 discharge: | |||
(a,b) Numerical impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the | |||
experimental radiation asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{rad}</math> respectively at the toroidal plane | |||
<math>\phi=14.5^{\circ}</math> that corresponds the SXR toroidal measurement plane. (c,d) Numerical | |||
impurity density asymmetry parameter <math>\alpha_{nZ}</math> and the experimental radiation asymmetry | |||
parameter <math>\alpha_{rad}</math> respectively at the toroidal plane <math>\phi=75.5^{\circ}</math> that corresponds | |||
the Bolometery toroidal position. Note the numerical and experimental scale sare | |||
the same <math>[-0.38, 0.38]</math>. Since neon impurities were puffed at trave levels during the discharges, the numerical | |||
results in (a,c) have considered <math>Z_{I}=10</math>, i.e. they have assumed fully ionization of Ne on the whole | |||
effective radius <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport | |||
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | |||
[[File:Photo_2018-07-20_09-32-57.jpg |thumb|right|500px| Figure 2. Same as in figure 1. but considering the ion-root discharge #45477 <ref> M. Ezzat ''Advanced neoclassical impurity transport | |||
modelling with experimental comparison for TJ-II'' Master Thesis (2018)</ref>]] | |||
== Proposal title == | == Proposal title == | ||
Line 40: | Line 56: | ||
== Description of required resources == | == Description of required resources == |
edits