76
edits
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions
Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement (view source)
Revision as of 17:52, 25 September 2016
, 25 September 2016no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
now I think it's probably clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only, since a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement. | now I think it's probably clear that, if it were possible, it would work with a multi-phase a.c only, since a pulsating d.c. or a full-wave rectified a.c. would produce divergent B-field lines from the central area of confinement. | ||
then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in the proper balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimum of useful frequency. | then, it seems that the problem with a multi-phase a.c. lies in finding the proper balance between the applied electric current and the magnets inductance to achieve a minimum of useful frequency to confine the D-T mixture and to induce a certain ''spin'' to it at the central area of the device. | ||
in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting many linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed. | in spite of the apparent current tendency to think that "more is better" and even "much more is best" respecting many linear devices, perhaps "less is more" in the case of the A models here proposed. | ||
[[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 14:39, 25 September 2016 (CEST) | [[User:Solo55|Solo]] ([[User talk:Solo55|talk]]) 14:39, 25 September 2016 (CEST) | ||