Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement: Difference between revisions

Talk:Single-Pointed Magnetic Confinement (view source)

1,170 bytes added , 29 February 2016

no edit summary

76

edits

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 12:19, 29 February 2016 (CET)
+In fact, these coils are not only similar, they are exactly the same than those of the "Yin-Yang" configuration for a Tandem Mirror Reactor as end stoppers to minimize leakage of positive particles from the ends of a center mirror cell, improving in this manner the previous Baseball Seam Coil that had been designed for the same function.
+However, the way to arrange them is different now and, most important, the electric energy input too.
+according to what I've read, Yin-Yang coils did work as a quadrupole, since a DC was applied to them to enhance the mirror effect at the central cell.
+But these new configurations seem to allow the possibility to apply a multi-phase electric input, producing in this way a very different resulting magnetic field at the central area of the reactor.
+thrre-phase for the A 3.0 model, four-phase for the A 4.0 model and five-phase for the A 5.0 model.
+My doubt at this moment is between two options with probably very different effects: either a multi-phase alternating current or a multi-phase pulsating direct current (if this were possible). but I lack the technical means and knowledges to find out which could be better.