4,422
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
In three dimensions, the existence of flux surfaces (nested or not) is not guaranteed. | In three dimensions, the existence of flux surfaces (nested or not) is not guaranteed. | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1761965 H. Grad, ''Toroidal Containment of a Plasma'', Phys. Fluids '''10''' (1967) 137]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1761965 H. Grad, ''Toroidal Containment of a Plasma'', Phys. Fluids '''10''' (1967) 137]</ref> | ||
Assuming an initial situation with nested magnetic surfaces, the [[Magnetic shear|rotational transform]] of the field line on the surface may either be irrational | Assuming an initial situation with nested magnetic surfaces, the [[Magnetic shear|rotational transform]] of the field line on the surface may either be irrational so that the field line covers the surface entirely, or rational. In the latter case, the surface is sensitive to small perturbations and flute-like instabilities may develop that lead to the formation of ''magnetic islands'' and ''stochastic regions'' (assuming non-zero resistivity). | ||
Since the field line trajectories are described by Hamiltonian equations, the [[:Wikipedia:Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser_theorem|KAM theorem]] is relevant; however, it should be noted that the force balance equation does not describe any detail on scales smaller than the gyroradius. | Since the field line trajectories are described by Hamiltonian equations, the [[:Wikipedia:Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser_theorem|KAM theorem]] is relevant; however, it should be noted that the force balance equation does not describe any detail on scales smaller than the gyroradius. | ||