TJ-II:Turbulence - Revision history

Admin at 11:19, 23 February 2017

2017-02-23T11:19:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 23 February 2017
Line 73:		Line 73:
	See also: [[TJ-II:Fast camera]].		See also: [[TJ-II:Fast camera]].

	== ~~See also~~ ==		=== Causality detection ===

	* [[Causality detection]]		To disentangle the complex relation between fluctuating variables, a technique for [[Causality detection]] has been used.
			<ref>B.Ph. van Milligen, G. Birkenmeier, M. Ramisch, T. Estrada, C. Hidalgo, and A. Alonso, Causality detection and turbulence in fusion plasmas, [[doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/2/023011\|Nucl. Fusion '''54''' (2014), 023011]]</ref>
			It has revealed that magnetic fluctuations may play an important role in the [[H-mode\|L-H transition]].
			<ref>B.Ph. van Milligen, T. Estrada, B.A. Carreras, E. Ascasíbar, C. Hidalgo, I. Pastor, J.M. Fontdecaba, R. Balbín, and the TJ-II Team, The causal impact of magnetic fluctuations in slow and fast L–H transitions at TJ-II, [[doi:10.1063/1.4958807\|Phys. Plasmas '''23''' (2016) 072305]]</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />

Admin at 10:27, 23 February 2017

2017-02-23T10:27:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 23 February 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Improving our understanding of turbulence is hard, due to (1) the complexity of fusion-grade plasmas (the presence of charged particles and magnetic fields make this into a much harder topic than fluid turbulence), (2) the enormous variety of plasma instabilities, and (3) the difficulty of diagnosing the plasma due to the hostile conditions inside the plasma.		Improving our understanding of turbulence is hard, due to (1) the complexity of fusion-grade plasmas (the presence of charged particles and magnetic fields make this into a much harder topic than fluid turbulence), (2) the enormous variety of plasma instabilities, and (3) the difficulty of diagnosing the plasma due to the hostile conditions inside the plasma.

	Our work on turbulence has focussed mainly on the analysis of edge [[TJ-II:Langmuir Probes\|Langmuir probe]] data, although some analysis was done on other types of data (e.g., [[TJ-II:Reflectometry\|reflectometry]] signals). Much effort was devoted to the development of new analysis techniques.		Our work on turbulence has focussed mainly on the analysis of edge [[TJ-II:Langmuir Probes\|Langmuir probe]] data, although some analysis was done on other types of data (e.g., [[TJ-II:Reflectometry\|reflectometry]] signals). Much effort was devoted to the development of new [[data analysis techniques]].

	=== Bicoherence and wavelets ===		=== Bicoherence and wavelets ===

Admin: /* Turbulence visualisation */

2017-02-23T10:23:52Z

Turbulence visualisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 23 February 2017
Line 72:		Line 72:
	<ref>D. Carralero et al, ''Turbulence studies by fast camera imaging experiments in the TJII stellarator'', [[doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.140\|J. Nucl. Mat. '''390-391''' (2009) 457]]</ref>		<ref>D. Carralero et al, ''Turbulence studies by fast camera imaging experiments in the TJII stellarator'', [[doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.140\|J. Nucl. Mat. '''390-391''' (2009) 457]]</ref>
	See also: [[TJ-II:Fast camera]].		See also: [[TJ-II:Fast camera]].

			== See also ==

			* [[Causality detection]]

	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />

Admin: /* Turbulence visualisation */

2017-02-23T10:22:13Z

Turbulence visualisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 23 February 2017
Line 71:		Line 71:
	<ref>J.A. Alonso et al, ''Impact of different confinement regimes on the two-dimensional structure of edge turbulence'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/48/12B/S44\|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''48''' (2006) B465]]</ref>		<ref>J.A. Alonso et al, ''Impact of different confinement regimes on the two-dimensional structure of edge turbulence'', [[doi:10.1088/0741-3335/48/12B/S44\|Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''48''' (2006) B465]]</ref>
	<ref>D. Carralero et al, ''Turbulence studies by fast camera imaging experiments in the TJII stellarator'', [[doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.140\|J. Nucl. Mat. '''390-391''' (2009) 457]]</ref>		<ref>D. Carralero et al, ''Turbulence studies by fast camera imaging experiments in the TJII stellarator'', [[doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.140\|J. Nucl. Mat. '''390-391''' (2009) 457]]</ref>
			See also: [[TJ-II:Fast camera]].

	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />

Admin: Corrected links

2017-02-23T10:19:50Z

Corrected links

Show changes

Admin: /* Self-similarity */

2012-04-04T14:48:31Z

Self-similarity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 4 April 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:
	Therefore, it is convenient to resort to the Rescaled-Range analysis technique and the determination of the Hurst exponent. We have shown that this type of analysis is far more robust with respect to random noise perturbations than the direct determination of the ACF or the Probability of Return.		Therefore, it is convenient to resort to the Rescaled-Range analysis technique and the determination of the Hurst exponent. We have shown that this type of analysis is far more robust with respect to random noise perturbations than the direct determination of the ACF or the Probability of Return.

	The analysis of data from Langmuir probes taken at the plasma edge in a wide variety of fusion devices reveals the existence of self-similar behaviour or long-range correlations in all devices studied. The observed variation of the Hurst exponent in the plasma edge, 0.62 < H < 0.75, is small in spite of the variety of devices.		The analysis of data from Langmuir probes taken at the plasma edge in a wide variety of fusion devices reveals the existence of self-similar behaviour or [[Long-range correlation\|long-range correlations]] in all devices studied. The observed variation of the Hurst exponent in the plasma edge, 0.62 < H < 0.75, is small in spite of the variety of devices.
	<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/5/3632/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Self-similarity of the plasma edge fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''5''', 10 (1998) 3632]</ref>		<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/5/3632/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Self-similarity of the plasma edge fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''5''', 10 (1998) 3632]</ref>
	On the other hand, the variation of H in the [[Scrape-Off Layer]] (SOL) is much larger. In Wendelstein VII-AS, a slight decrease in H at the sheared flow layer was observed, possibly corresponding to a local decorrelation effect.		On the other hand, the variation of H in the [[Scrape-Off Layer]] (SOL) is much larger. In Wendelstein VII-AS, a slight decrease in H at the sheared flow layer was observed, possibly corresponding to a local decorrelation effect.

	The repeated occurrence of values of H differing significantly from the value corresponding to random noise (H = 0.5) in all machines points to a universal aspect of the underlying turbulence. Further, the degree of self-similarity detected implies the existence of long-range correlations (with respect to the correlation time).		The repeated occurrence of values of H differing significantly from the value corresponding to random noise (H = 0.5) in all machines points to a universal aspect of the underlying turbulence. Further, the degree of self-similarity detected implies the existence of [[Long-range correlation\|long-range correlations]] (with respect to the correlation time).
	<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/485/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Long-range time dependence in the cross-correlation function'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 2 (1999) 485]</ref>		<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/485/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Long-range time dependence in the cross-correlation function'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 2 (1999) 485]</ref>
	<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/1885/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Experimental evidence of long-range correlation and self-similarity in plasma fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 5 (1999) 1885]</ref>		<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/1885/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Experimental evidence of long-range correlation and self-similarity in plasma fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 5 (1999) 1885]</ref>

Admin: revert vandalism

2011-07-16T09:58:22Z

revert vandalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Thats really sehrwd! Good~~ to ~~see~~ the ~~logic set out~~ so well.		Transport in fusion-grade plasmas is often dominated by turbulent transport.
			In contrast with [[Neoclassical transport]], turbulent transport (assumed to be the cause of the experimental so-called "[[Anomalous transport\|anomalous]]" component of transport) is not well understood.
			As a consequence, predictions of machine performance generally rely on rather crude [[Scaling law\|scaling law techniques]], rather than first-principles calculations.
			Improving our understanding of turbulence is hard, due to (1) the complexity of fusion-grade plasmas (the presence of charged particles and magnetic fields make this into a much harder topic than fluid turbulence), (2) the enormous variety of plasma instabilities, and (3) the difficulty of diagnosing the plasma due to the hostile conditions inside the plasma.

			Our work on turbulence has focussed mainly on the analysis of edge [[TJ-II:Langmuir Probes\|Langmuir probe]] data, although some analysis was done on other types of data (e.g., [[TJ-II:Reflectometry\|reflectometry]] signals). Much effort was devoted to the development of new analysis techniques.

			=== Bicoherence and wavelets ===

			[[File:Bicoherence.png\|300px\|thumb\|right\|Auto-[[Bicoherence\|bicoherence]] graph (''E<sub>θ</sub>'') during a spontaneous confinement transition at TJ-II, showing the coupling of high to low frequencies (horizontal and diagonal lines), i.e., a possible inverse spectral cascade. (from B.Ph. van Milligen et al, Nucl. Fusion 48 (2008) 115003)]]
			Turbulence is essentially non-linear.
			Non-linear interactions can be detected by means of higher-order spectra (e.g. quadratic interactions can be detected through the bi-spectrum). With Fourier analysis, however, in order to achieve statistically significant values for the bi-spectrum, very long time series are necessary. This fact has mostly precluded its use in fields like plasma turbulence, since long steady-state data series are not generally available. In our work, for the first time, the [[Bicoherence\|bicoherence]] was calculated using wavelet transforms, thus making the detection of non-linear interactions with time resolution possible.
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.395 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Nonlinear phenomena and intermittency in plasma turbulence'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''74''', 3 (1995) 395]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/2/3017/1 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Wavelet bicoherence: a new turbulence analysis tool'', Phys. Plasmas '''2''', 8 (1995) 3017]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/68/967/1 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Statistically robust linear and non-linear wavelet analysis applied to plasma edge turbulence'', Rev. Sci. Instrum. '''68''' (1997) 967]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4842 P.H. Diamond et al, ''In search of the elusive zonal flow using cross-bicoherence analysis'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''84''', 12 (2000) 4842]</ref>
			A relation was found between confinement transitions and an increase of the bicoherence, as expected in the framework of [[TJ-II:Confinement transitions\|shear/zonal flow]] models for turbulence stabilisation.
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/48/11/115003 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Bicoherence during confinement transitions in the TJ-II stellarator'', Nucl. Fusion '''48''' (2008) 115003]</ref>

			=== Self-similarity ===

			Important transport phenomena such as [[Profile consistency\|profile stiffness (consistency)]],
			<ref>[http://www.jspf.or.jp/PFR/PFR_articles/pfr2008S1/pfr2008_03-S1070.html B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Quantifying profile stiffness'', Plasma and Fusion Research, '''3''' (2008) S1070]</ref>
			power degradation, the rapid propagation of perturbations,
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/3/004 B.Ph. van Milligen et al, ''Pulse propagation in a simple probabilistic transport model'', Nucl. Fusion '''47''' (2007) 189]</ref>
			and the Bohm [[Scaling law\|scaling]] of plasma confinement might be explained on the basis of profile self-regulation in the framework of the [[Self-Organised Criticality]] paradigm. This paradigm predicts that transport is regulated by avalanches, which would generate self-similar behaviour in space and time of the turbulent data.

			In order to test this hypothesis, one can determine the shape of the autocorrelation function (ACF) of turbulent signals.
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/3/2664/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Fluctuation-induced flux at the plasma edge in toroidal devices'', Phys. Plasmas '''3''' (7) (1996) 2664]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4438 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Long-range time correlations in plasma edge turbulence'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''80''', (1998) 4438]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3653 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Self-similarity properties of the probability distribution function of turbulence-induced particle fluxes at the plasma edge'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''83''' (1999) 3653]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/7/3278/1 B.A. Carreras, ''Intermittency of plasma edge fluctuation data: Multifractal analysis'', Phys. Plasmas, '''7''', 8 (2000) 3278]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/44/8/309 C. Hidalgo et al, ''Empirical similarity in the probability density function of turbulent transport in the edge plasma region in fusion plasmas'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''44''' (2002) 1557]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/12/052507/1 B.Ph. Van Milligen et al, ''Additional evidence for the universality of turbulent fluctuations and fluxes in the scrape-off layer region of fusion plasmas'', Phys. Plasmas '''12''' (2005) 052507]</ref>

			Unfortunately, the most revealing information is present in the tail of the distribution (i.e., well beyond the correlation time), where statistics are generally poor.
			Therefore, it is convenient to resort to the Rescaled-Range analysis technique and the determination of the Hurst exponent. We have shown that this type of analysis is far more robust with respect to random noise perturbations than the direct determination of the ACF or the Probability of Return.

			The analysis of data from Langmuir probes taken at the plasma edge in a wide variety of fusion devices reveals the existence of self-similar behaviour or long-range correlations in all devices studied. The observed variation of the Hurst exponent in the plasma edge, 0.62 < H < 0.75, is small in spite of the variety of devices.
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/5/3632/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Self-similarity of the plasma edge fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''5''', 10 (1998) 3632]</ref>
			On the other hand, the variation of H in the [[Scrape-Off Layer]] (SOL) is much larger. In Wendelstein VII-AS, a slight decrease in H at the sheared flow layer was observed, possibly corresponding to a local decorrelation effect.

			The repeated occurrence of values of H differing significantly from the value corresponding to random noise (H = 0.5) in all machines points to a universal aspect of the underlying turbulence. Further, the degree of self-similarity detected implies the existence of long-range correlations (with respect to the correlation time).
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/485/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Long-range time dependence in the cross-correlation function'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 2 (1999) 485]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/1885/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Experimental evidence of long-range correlation and self-similarity in plasma fluctuations'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 5 (1999) 1885]</ref>

			In this framework, an important technique is the quiet-time analysis.
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.036124 R. Sánchez et al, ''Quiet-time statistics: A tool to probe the dynamics of self-organized-criticality systems from within the strong overlapping regime'', Phys. Rev. E, '''66''' (2002) 036124]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.185005 R. Sánchez et al, ''Quiet-time statistics of electrostatic turbulent fluxes from the JET tokamak and the W7-AS and TJ-II stellarators'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''90''', 185005 (2003)]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/12/052304/1 V.E. Lynch et al, ''Determination of long-range correlation by quiet-time statistics'', Phys. Plasmas '''12''' (2005) 052304]</ref>

			=== Turbulence classification ===

			An important effort has also been made to identify and classify turbulence,
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/7/1408/1 E. Sánchez et al, ''Statistical characterization of fluctuation waveforms in the boundary region of fusion and non-fusion plasmas'', Phys. Plasmas '''7''', 5 (2000) 1408]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/42/4/302 I. García-Cortés et al, ''Turbulent transport studies in the JET edge plasmas in limiter configuration'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''42''' (2000) 389]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.06.012 C. Hidalgo et al, ''Intermittency and structures in edge plasma turbulence'', Comptes Rendus Physique '''7''', 6 (2006) 679]</ref>
			to analyse its spectra,
			<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3621 M. A. Pedrosa et al, ''Empirical similarity of frequency spectra of the edge plasma fluctuations in toroidal magnetic confinement systems'', Phys. Rev. Lett. '''82''' (1999) 3621]</ref>
			<ref>[http://link.aip.org/link/?PHPAEN/6/4615/1 B.A. Carreras et al, ''Characterization of the frequency ranges of the plasma edge fluctuation spectra'', Phys. Plasmas '''6''', 12 (1999) 4615]</ref>
			<ref>M. A. Pedrosa et al, ''Studies of spectra of the edge plasma fluctuations in toroidal magnetic confinement systems'', J. Plasma Fusion. Res. SERIES, '''2''' (1999) 77</ref>
			and to determine its relation with local plasma parameters (rational surfaces, gradients, electric fields).
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022859915916 M.A. Pedrosa et al, ''Role of rational surfaces on fluctuations and transport in the plasma edge of the TJ-II stellarator'', Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, '''50''', 12 (2000) 1463]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/42/10/305 B. Gonçalves et al, ''Experimental investigation of dynamical coupling between density gradients, radial electric fields and turbulent transport in the JET plasma boundary region'', Nucl. Fusion '''42''' (2002) 1205]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026388305808 M.A. Pedrosa et al, ''Edge turbulence during limiter biasing experiments in the TJ-II stellarator'', Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, '''53''' (2003) 877]</ref>

			=== Turbulence visualisation ===

			Recently, much effort is being dedicated to the visualization of turbulent structures, and to the corresponding analysis techniques for extracting quantitative information from the images.
			<ref>[http://www.new.ans.org/pubs/journals/fst/a_1250 J. A. Alonso et al, ''Two-Dimensional Turbulence Analysis Using High-Speed Visible Imaging in TJ-II Edge Plasmas'', Fusion Science and Technology '''50''', 2 (2006) 301]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/48/12B/S44 J.A. Alonso et al, ''Impact of different confinement regimes on the two-dimensional structure of edge turbulence'', Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion '''48''' (2006) B465]</ref>
			<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.140 D. Carralero et al, ''Turbulence studies by fast camera imaging experiments in the TJII stellarator'', J. Nucl. Mat. '''390-391''' (2009) 457]</ref>

			== References ==
			<references />

212.121.198.236: HfhEkRdLxmhtU

2011-07-16T09:30:47Z

HfhEkRdLxmhtU

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~AFAIC that's~~ the ~~best asnewr~~ so ~~far!~~		Thats really sehrwd! Good to see the logic set out so well.

218.138.32.40: TtSntXmGReb

2011-07-16T08:49:30Z

TtSntXmGReb

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Kewl you should come up with~~ that~~. Excellnet~~!		AFAIC that's the best asnewr so far!

190.246.146.190: iWJiHxGVQpOfQwXSh

2011-07-16T08:05:39Z

iWJiHxGVQpOfQwXSh

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~And I thought I was the seinsble one. Thanks for setting me straight~~.		Kewl you should come up with that. Excellnet!